(INSERT SNARKY FEMALE-JOCK STEREOTYPE HERE)

ESPN and the New Orleans Times-Picayune are reporting that Louisiana State women's basketball coach former women's basketball coach Pokey Chatman abruptly quit because her LSU bosses got wind that she was in "an inappropriate sexual relationship" with a former player (ESPN) or engaged in "inappropriate conduct with players" (T-P). Take your pick.

Allegedly. Sources say.

LSU Athletic Director Skip Bertman -- who got his start in college baseball before the advent of the batting helmet -- wouldn't say much to Baton Rouge's WAFB television, except that the Picayune reporter, James Varney, ought to be "baked in oil."

Famed New Orleans chef Emeril Lagasse told reporters that LSU officials should be careful not to leave Varney in the oven too long, and not to turn the heat above 375. He said that so long as the reporter "didn't get all dried out and tough," he'd be "scrumptious drizzled with lemon juice and butter, with a sprinkling of chives and a radicchio garnish. BAM! Kick it up a notch wit some Bac-Os!"

I made that Emeril part up. But not the "baked in oil" part.

For what it's worth, here's an excerpt from the ESPN story:

BATON ROUGE, La. -- Pokey Chatman resigned as the head women's basketball coach at Louisiana State University on Wednesday after the university became aware of an alleged inappropriate sexual relationship between Chatman and a former player on Chatman's team, sources told ESPN.com. The university, the sources said, learned of the relationship from an employee within the basketball program.

ESPN.com's attempts to reach the employee by telephone and e-mail on Thursday night were unsuccessful.

Chatman, who initially revealed plans to quit after the postseason, says she will not coach the Lady Tigers in the NCAA Tournament. In a statement released Thursday afternoon, Chatman said: "My resignation yesterday has prompted speculation and rumors that far exceeded my expectations and it is clear that my presence would be a great distraction during the NCAA Tournament."

Assistant coach Bob Starkey, who will take over the team for now, declined to say whether he was aware of any improper conduct.

"There's been 20 to 25 things that are just floating out there, and I think she thought if she just stepped away from it she could eliminate that from even multiplying," Starkey said. "She has her reasons, and hopefully, soon she'll address that herself.''

LSU athletic director Skip Bertman told the Times Picayune of New Orleans, which first reported Chatman's alleged misconduct with one or more players Thursday on its Web site, that no formal inquiry into Chatman's conduct had been opened by the university. He did acknowledge, though, that an informal investigation "might have happened."

"The girl did what she did and LSU had no control over that," Bertman said, referring to Chatman.

IF POKEY WERE A MAN -- and praise Jesus that, with a name like "Pokey," she ain't . . . not now -- I would say, "Dammit, why couldn't he just keep it in his damn pants?" But when it's a 30-something woman coach allegedly getting all lovey dovey with the girls, I am sooooooo at a loss for a snappy rejoinder.

At least one I can print.

Let the 'trials of Job' end with the triumph of Job

And so one day, while his sons and his daughters were eating and drinking wine in the house of their eldest brother, a messenger came to Job and said, "The oxen were plowing and the asses grazing beside them, and the Sabeans carried them off in a raid. They put the herdsmen to the sword, and I alone have escaped to tell you."

While he was yet speaking, another came and said, "Lightning has fallen from heaven and struck the sheep and their shepherds and consumed them; and I alone have escaped to tell you."

While he was yet speaking, another came and said, "The Chaldeans formed three columns, seized the camels, carried them off, and put those tending them to the sword, and I alone have escaped to tell you."

While he was yet speaking, another came and said, "Your sons and daughters were eating and drinking wine in the house of their eldest brother, when suddenly a great wind came across the desert and smote the four corners of the house. It fell upon the young people and they are dead; and I alone have escaped to tell you."

Then Job began to tear his cloak and cut off his hair. He cast himself prostrate upon the ground, and said, "Naked I came forth from my mother's womb, and naked shall I go back again. The LORD gave and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD!"

In all this Job did not sin, nor did he say anything disrespectful of God.

Once again the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came with them.

And the LORD said to Satan, "Whence do you come?" And Satan answered the LORD and said, "From roaming the earth and patrolling it."

And the LORD said to Satan, "Have you noticed my servant Job, and that there is no one on earth like him, faultless and upright, fearing God and avoiding evil? He still holds fast to his innocence although you incited me against him to ruin him without cause."

And Satan answered the LORD and said, "Skin for skin! All that a man has will he give for his life.

But now put forth your hand and touch his bone and his flesh, and surely he will blaspheme you to your face."

And the LORD said to Satan, "He is in your power; only spare his life."

So Satan went forth from the presence of the LORD and smote Job with severe boils from the soles of his feet to the crown of his head.

And he took a potsherd to scrape himself, as he sat among the ashes.

Then his wife said to him, "Are you still holding to your innocence? Curse God and die."

But he said to her, "Are even you going to speak as senseless women do? We accept good things from God; and should we not accept evil?" Through all this, Job said nothing sinful.

Now when three of Job's friends heard of all the misfortune that had come upon him, they set out each one from his own place: Eliphaz from Teman, Bildad from Shuh, and Zophar from Naamath. They met and journeyed together to give him sympathy and comfort.

But when, at a distance, they lifted up their eyes and did not recognize him, they began to weep aloud; they tore their cloaks and threw dust upon their heads.

Then they sat down upon the ground with him seven days and seven nights, but none of them spoke a word to him; for they saw how great was his suffering.

Job 1:13 - 2:13

ON THIS EARTH, the Lord has no hands and no feet but for yours and mine. We know from the end of Job's story that the afflicted and tested servant of God ended up getting back more than he lost.

But in this Lenten season, when we're called on to do penance and give alms, we find that 26-year-old Kristy Dusseau has lost everything -- everything but her life and her family's great love -- to her fight against leukemia. And she won't begin to be restored from her "trials of Job" unless we help do it.

So let's do it.

Go to Kristy Recovers.com to learn about Kristy and about how to donate.

Here's the address to send checks:

KDLife Trust
28406 Sheeks
Flat Rock, MI 48134

Psalm 127

EDITOR'S NOTE: Just in case you forgot, we continue today with Revolution 21's "Psalms for Lent" series.

A Song of degrees for Solomon.

1 Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the LORD keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain.
2 It is vain for you to rise up early, to sit up late, to eat the bread of sorrows: for so he giveth his beloved sleep.
3 Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.
4 As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth.
5 Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them: they shall not be ashamed, but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate.

LBJ on acid

Rod Dreher over at Crunchy Con noted the phony Southern accent Sen. Hillary Clinton affected for her speech commemorating the 1965 attack on civil-rights marchers in Selma, Ala. Br'er Dreher says the hilarity ensuing from the senator's doofusey attempt at a Black Southern drawl -- and better yet, attempted at an African-American church service -- reminded him of Officer Hopkins ("Hoppy") on the 1970s sitcom Sanford and Son.

Certainly Hillary (as in Hillary for President . . . if she's elected, will she become like one of those single-named Afghan warlords?) was Hoppy-esque in her fish-out-of-watertude, but calling the woman "Hoppy" doesn't quite cover what it was I heard in the above clip.

I'm a few years older than Rod, and I know EXACTLY what I heard on that clip:

Lyndon Baines Johnson, 36th President of the United States.

On acid.

Psalm 20

To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David.

1 The LORD hear thee in the day of trouble; the name of the God of Jacob defend thee;
2 Send thee help from the sanctuary, and strengthen thee out of Zion;
3 Remember all thy offerings, and accept thy burnt sacrifice; Selah.
4 Grant thee according to thine own heart, and fulfil all thy counsel.
5 We will rejoice in thy salvation, and in the name of our God we will set up our banners: the LORD fulfil all thy petitions.
6 Now know I that the LORD saveth his anointed; he will hear him from his holy heaven with the saving strength of his right hand.
7 Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God.
8 They are brought down and fallen: but we are risen, and stand upright.
9 Save, LORD: let the king hear us when we call.

We interrupt Mr. Soprano Goes to Washington for this Revolution 21 special report . . .

We have just received information from the Radio and Internet Newsletter of some glaring discrepancies in how the federal government treats internet broadcasters seeking to webcast music programs legally and radio conglomerates completely innocent of even thinking about violating federal law (wink, wink, nudge, nudge).

With the details, here is Kurt Hanson at RAIN headquarters:

I checked my notes last night from hearing a recent speech by Pandora founder Tim Westergren in Chicago, and the amount owed could potentially be even greater than I estimated in the article.

Westergren says Pandora currently has 6 million registered users; let's guess that at the end of 2006 they had at least 5 million. If the average user sets up 1.5 "stations," that's a 2006 royalty obligation of $3.75 billion.

That's billion with a "B."

MEANTIME, we understand the Chicago Tribune has the scoop on a settlement between the Federal Communications Commission and several large radio chains involving alleged transgressions of federal "payola" laws:

Tired of the same old thing on the radio?

So are federal regulators and independent music labels.

Weary of the illicit, recurrent practice known as payola, the two groups have reached tentative agreements with leading broadcasters to curb pay-for-play schemes and expand radio playlists.

Sources said Monday that four major radio companies are close to finalizing not only a consent decree with the Federal Communications Commission, but also a deal with a group of independent music labels promising 8,400 half-hour airtime segments to local and lesser-known artists.

CBS Radio, Citadel Broadcasting, Clear Channel Communications and Entercom Communications were accused of accepting money, airline tickets, clothing and other gifts from major labels to play certain songs by artists such as Liz Phair, Jessica Simpson and Avril Lavigne.

Now they will be expected to throw open the airwaves to a more eclectic mix.

"There are plenty of empty gestures out there. This one has the reality of a number attached to it, which makes it all the more serious of a commitment and an extraordinary one," said Peter Gordon, president of Thirsty Ear Recordings, who led the negotiations on behalf of the American Association of Independent Music.

Gordon said independent music actually may wind up being accounted for "on a track-by-track basis" rather than in half-hour blocks.

Separately, the broadcasters, under the terms of the three-year settlement with the FCC, would pay a total of $12.5 million in fines. They also would agree to restrictions and closer scrutiny of their dealings with record labels, including greater record-keeping and the hiring of compliance officers, but admit no wrongdoing.

The FCC has no authority over record labels, but used the evidence gathered in the payola investigation begun in 2004 by former New York Atty. Gen. Eliot Spitzer.

Now governor of New York, Spitzer thwarted payola in that state by EMI Group, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group.

The new music agreement gives airtime to labels not owned or controlled by those major music companies.

"Payola breaks the link between merit and airplay," FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein said. "It's who's got wads of cash, not who's got the best song. The public loses out in that. I think we see radio being damaged.

"People I talk to all across the country are tired of hearing the same songs over and over again. Hopefully, by taking payola out of the equation, and on top of that adding some new fresh sounds from local and independent artists, you can bring back the vitality that's missing from radio. So it's a historic commitment."

One radio industry veteran who requested anonymity said the only certain effect of the deal would be add paperwork and bureaucracy to the business.

A spokeswoman for CBS Radio declined to comment. Representatives of Citadel and Entercom did not return calls. Andy Levin, Clear Channel's executive vice president and chief legal officer, said in a statement that his company was glad the FCC's investigation was effectively over, noting no violations were found.

YOU CAN'T SAY the good ol' U.S. of A doesn't have the best government money can buy.

Now, if only I could get me some money to buy me some government.

Digital copyright law, explained

SEE, IT'S LIKE DIS.

Da record companies is like da Syndicate, ya' see? And da front, dat SoundExchange dat collects da royalty payments fum people, it's like yer neighborhood bookie.

Y'unnerstand?

Now da bookie is in da pocket uh da Syndicate, right? And he does what he's told, if he knows what's good fer 'im. So nowadays, when yer a webcaster or whaddevah, you gots ta deal wid da neighborhood bookie -- SoundExchange -- if you want ta get inna da action, right?

An' it's a losin' propasishun, if ya see what I'm sayin.

Kinda like bettin' on da Cubs ta be in da Series, ya' see? Yer screwed, an' after ya' lose yer ass, ya' gotta pay da pipah. Dat's da bookie -- SoundExchange.

And, of course, any good bookie got muscle, y'see? Like Rocky Balboa was before he got his shot at Apollo Creed, only dese guys don't got no heart of gold, right? And da muscle is da feds and da courts, and dey in da pocket uh da Syndicate. Dey got a little somethin' somethin', don'tcha know?

Da bookie -- and da Syndicate -- dey don't get no cut of the action . . . you don't pay up, somebody's legs is gonna get broke. Da feds don't screw aroun'.

Y'unnerstand, pally?

It takes a little story to tell the Big Story

From the Monroe (La.) News-Star:

Northeastern Louisiana might have missed out on a Toyota Motor Corp. assembly plant and 2,000 jobs because of litter and a workforce that lacks basic skills, according to state Sen. Robert Barham.

Barham, R-Oak Ridge, said that he had dinner with a site selector for a major auto manufacturer last month who outlined the strengths and weaknesses of Louisiana’s Franklin Farms Industrial Megasite near Holly Ridge in Richland Parish.

Barham wouldn’t identify the site selector or the project, but Toyota announced last week that it will build a new manufacturing plant in Tupelo, Miss., that will employ 2,000.

“He was very open and forthright about the plusses and minuses of the site,”
Barham said. “There were two big negatives. One was a woefully unprepared workforce and the other was he said that he doesn’t know of a trashier place.”

Barham, who was attending the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry legislative luncheon at the West Monroe Convention Center, said that the site selector drove a group of Japanese auto executives from the Monroe Regional Airport to the Franklin Farms Megasite via Interstate 20.

“He told me that he could tell that when they saw the amount of litter they wanted to get back on the plane and leave,” Barham said. “Their thinking was, ‘If anybody can do this to the place they live how can we count on them to make sure a bolt is tight.’

“We ought to take this on as a project – make sure that the corridor from Monroe to Holly Ridge is Disney World clean.”

Tana Trichel, the local contact for the Franklin Farms site, said the unidentified site selector is on target.

“Our own national consultant has told us that litter is a problem,” Trichel said. “We need to have a huge beautification program throughout the corridor from our commercial hub of Monroe all the way to the site.”

Monroe Mayor Jamie Mayo said that the litter problem “is getting worse instead of better.”

“There has to be more pride of ownership by our citizens,” Mayo said. “It doesn’t do any good for a municipality to clean up a site when the next day it’s going to be overrun by litter again.”

TRASH-STREWN WASTELAND. Ill-educated, unskilled workforce. Broken civic culture. With what does one usually associate such things?

And why is such Third World civic dishevelment tolerated in the world's richest nation? After all, don't we spend billions of taxpayer dollars to alleviate such in various Middle Eastern, Latin American and African hellholes?

What? Is it not politically correct to demand of our fellow Americans what we aspire to achieve halfway across the world -- and then commit the resources and political will to help make it so?

Psalm 3

A Psalm of David, when he fled from Absalom his son.

1 LORD, how are they increased that trouble me! many are they that rise up against me.
2 Many there be which say of my soul, There is no help for him in God. Selah.
3 But thou, O LORD, art a shield for me; my glory, and the lifter up of mine head.
4 I cried unto the LORD with my voice, and he heard me out of his holy hill. Selah.
5 I laid me down and slept; I awaked; for the LORD sustained me.
6 I will not be afraid of ten thousands of people, that have set themselves against me round about.
7 Arise, O LORD; save me, O my God: for thou hast smitten all mine enemies upon the cheek bone; thou hast broken the teeth of the ungodly.
8 Salvation belongeth unto the LORD: thy blessing is upon thy people. Selah.

Washington Post lifts up rock, all kinds of things slither out

You knew it wasn't just Walter Reed, right?

Right?

The Washington Post gets an earful:

Ray Oliva went into the spare bedroom in his home in Kelseyville, Calif., to wrestle with his feelings. He didn't know a single soldier at Walter Reed, but he felt he knew them all. He worried about the wounded who were entering the world of military health care, which he knew all too well. His own VA hospital in Livermore was a mess. The gown he wore was torn. The wheelchairs were old and broken.

"It is just not Walter Reed," Oliva slowly tapped out on his keyboard at 4:23 in the afternoon on Friday. "The VA hospitals are not good either except for the staff who work so hard. It brings tears to my eyes when I see my brothers and sisters having to deal with these conditions. I am 70 years old, some say older than dirt but when I am with my brothers and sisters we become one and are made whole again."

Oliva is but one quaking voice in a vast outpouring of accounts filled with emotion and anger about the mistreatment of wounded outpatients at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Stories of neglect and substandard care have flooded in from soldiers, their family members, veterans, doctors and nurses working inside the system. They describe depressing living conditions for outpatients at other military bases around the country, from Fort Lewis in Washington state to Fort Dix in New Jersey. They tell stories -- their own versions, not verified -- of callous responses to combat stress and a system ill equipped to handle another generation of psychologically scarred vets.

The official reaction to the revelations at Walter Reed has been swift, and it has exposed the potential political costs of ignoring Oliva's 24.3 million comrades -- America's veterans -- many of whom are among the last standing supporters of the Iraq war. In just two weeks, the Army secretary has been fired, a two-star general relieved of command and two special commissions appointed; congressional subcommittees are lining up for hearings, the first today at Walter Reed; and the president, in his weekly radio address, redoubled promises to do right by the all-volunteer force, 1.5 million of whom have fought in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But much deeper has been the reaction outside Washington, including from many of the 600,000 new veterans who left the service after Iraq and Afghanistan. Wrenching questions have dominated blogs, talk shows, editorial cartoons, VFW spaghetti suppers and the solitary late nights of soldiers and former soldiers who fire off e-mails to reporters, members of Congress and the White House -- looking, finally, for attention and solutions.

Several forces converged to create this intense reaction. A new Democratic majority in Congress is willing to criticize the administration. Senior retired officers pounded the Pentagon with sharp questions about what was going on. Up to 40 percent of the troops fighting in Iraq are National Guard members and reservists -- "our neighbors," said Ron Glasser, a physician and author of a book about the wounded. "It all adds up and reaches a kind of tipping point," he said. On top of all that, America had believed the government's assurances that the wounded were being taken care of. "The country is embarrassed" to know otherwise, Glasser said.

The scandal has reverberated through generations of veterans. "It's been a potent reminder of past indignities and past traumas," said Thomas A. Mellman, a professor of psychiatry at Howard University who specializes in post-traumatic stress and has worked in Veterans Affairs hospitals. "The fact that it's been responded to so quickly has created mixed feelings -- gratification, but obvious regret and anger that such attention wasn't given before, especially for Vietnam veterans."

Across the country, some military quarters for wounded outpatients are in bad shape, according to interviews, Government Accountability Office reports and transcripts of congressional testimony. The mold, mice and rot of Walter Reed's Building 18 compose a familiar scenario for many soldiers back from Iraq or Afghanistan who were shipped to their home posts for treatment. Nearly 4,000 outpatients are currently in the military's Medical Holding or Medical Holdover companies, which oversee the wounded. Soldiers report bureaucratic disarray similar to Walter Reed's: indifferent, untrained staff; lost paperwork; medical appointments that drop from the computers; and long waits for consultations.

Sandy Karen was horrified when her 21-year-old son was discharged from the Naval Medical Center in San Diego a few months ago and told to report to the outpatient barracks, only to find the room swarming with fruit flies, trash overflowing and a syringe on the table. "The staff sergeant says, 'Here are your linens' to my son, who can't even stand up," said Karen, of Brookeville, Md. "This kid has an open wound, and I'm going to put him in a room with fruit flies?" She took her son to a hotel instead.

"My concern is for the others, who don't have a parent or someone to fight for them," Karen said. "These are just kids. Who would have ever looked in on my son?"

Capt. Leslie Haines was sent to Fort Knox in Kentucky for treatment in 2004 after being flown out of Iraq. "The living conditions were the worst I'd ever seen for soldiers," he said. "Paint peeling, mold, windows that didn't work. I went to the hospital chaplain to get them to issue blankets and linens. There were no nurses. You had wounded and injured leading the troops."

Hundreds of soldiers contacted The Washington Post through telephone calls and e-mails, many of them describing their bleak existence in Medhold.

From Fort Campbell in Kentucky: "There were yellow signs on the door stating our barracks had asbestos."

From Fort Bragg in North Carolina: "They are on my [expletive] like a diaper. . . . there are people getting chewed up everyday."

From Fort Dix in New Jersey: "Scare tactics are used against soldiers who will write sworn statement to assist fellow soldiers for their medical needs."

From Fort Irwin in California: "Most of us have had to sign waivers where we understand that the housing we were in failed to meet minimal government standards."

Soldiers back from Iraq worry that their psychological problems are only beginning to surface. "The hammer is just coming down, I can feel it," said retired Maj. Anthony DeStefano of New Jersey, describing his descent into post-traumatic stress and the Army's propensity to medicate rather than talk. When he returned home, Army doctors put him on the antipsychotic drug Seroquel. "That way, you can screw their lights out and they won't feel a thing," he said of patients like himself. "By the time they understand what is going on, they are through the Board and stuck with an unfavorable percentage of disability" benefits.

Nearly 64,000 of the more than 184,000 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans who have sought VA health care have been diagnosed with potential symptoms of post-traumatic stress, drug abuse or other mental disorders as of the end of June, according to the latest report by the Veterans Health Administration. Of those, nearly 30,000 have possible post-traumatic stress disorder, the report said.

VA hospitals are also receiving a surge of new patients after more than five years of combat. At the sprawling James J. Peters VA Medical Center in the Bronx, N.Y., Spec. Roberto Reyes Jr. lies nearly immobile and unable to talk. Once a strapping member of Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry, Reyes got too close to an improvised explosive device in Iraq and was sent to Walter Reed, where doctors did all they could before shipping him to the VA for the remainder of his life. A cloudy bag of urine hangs from his wheelchair. His mother and his aunt are constant bedside companions; Reyes, 25, likes for them to get two inches from his face, so he can pull on their noses with the few fingers he can still control.

Maria Mendez, his aunt, complained about the hospital staff. "They fight over who's going to have to give him a bath -- in front of him!" she said. Reyes suffered third-degree burns on his leg when a nurse left him in a shower unattended. He was unable to move himself away from the scalding water. His aunt found out only later, when she saw the burns.

Going . . . going . . .

Jackson Square, 1984. This (as well as the courtyard below) will be oceanfront
property by 2024 -- probably sooner -- to be left in ruins by the first decent
hurricane's storm surge.

HURRICANE KATRINA CONTINUES to be the great exposer of Louisiana's -- indeed, America's -- Rot Below the Surface (TM). Back on the front burner, thanks to Bob Marshall's staggering series in the New Orleans Times-Picayune this week, is the little matter of Disappearing Louisiana.

Literally. Sinking beneath the Gulf waves, day by day, no end in sight.

The satellite map in Kerry St. Pe's office shows the great sweep of marshes protecting New Orleans from the Gulf in bright red, a warning they will vanish by the year 2040, putting the sea at the city's doorstep.

Coastal scientists produced the map three years ago.

They now know they got it wrong.

"People think we still have 20, 30, 40 years left to get this done. They're not even close," said St. Pe, director of the Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary Program, which seeks to save one of the coast's most threatened and strategically vital zones.

"Ten years is how much time we have left -- if that."

That new time frame for when the Gulf could reach New Orleans' suburbs sharply reduces projections that have stood for more than three decades. Unless the state rapidly reverses the land loss, coastal scientists say, by the middle of the next decade the cost of repair likely will be too daunting for Congress to accept -- and take far too long to implement under the current approval process.

Interviews with the leading coastal scientists, as well as state and federal officials, brought no disagreement with that stark new prognosis. And while the predictions stand at odds with nearly a decade of official optimism, scientists said the death and destruction caused by Hurricane Katrina prompted them to voice private concerns that have been growing in recent years.

"I think that shocked us as much as any other group," said Robert Twilley, director of Louisiana State University's Gulf restoration initiative who has worked on the issue for years. "I think our concern now is that we may have contributed to false optimism."

Unless, within 10 years, the state begins creating more wetlands than it is losing -- a task that will require billions of dollars in complex and politically sensitive projects -- scientists said a series of catastrophes could begin to unfold over the next decade.

In 10 years, at current land-loss rates:

-- Gulf waves that once ended on barrier island beaches far from the city could be crashing on levees behind suburban lawns.

-- The state will be forced to begin abandoning outlying communities such as Lafitte, Golden Meadow, Cocodrie, Montegut, Leeville, Grand Isle and Port Fourchon.

-- The infrastructure serving a vital portion of the nation's domestic energy production will be exposed to the encroaching Gulf.

-- Many levees built to withstand a few hours of storm surge will be standing in water 24 hours a day -- and facing the monster surges that come with tropical storms.

-- Hurricanes approaching from the south will treat the city like beachfront property, crushing it with forces like those experienced by the Mississippi Gulf Coast during Katrina.

The entire nation would reel from the losses. The state's coastal wetlands, the largest in the continental United States, nourish huge industries that serve all Americans, not just residents of southeastern Louisiana. Twenty-seven percent of America's oil and 30 percent of its gas travels through the state's coast, serving half of the nation's refinery capacity, an infrastructure that few other states would welcome and that would take years to relocate. Ports along the Mississippi River, including the giant Port of New Orleans and the Port of South Louisiana in LaPlace, handle 56 percent of the nation's grain shipments. And the estuaries now rapidly turning to open water produce half of the nation's wild shrimp crop and about a third of its oysters and blue claw crabs. Studies show destruction of the wetlands protecting the infrastructure serving those industries would put $103 billion in assets at risk.

Despite such dire threats, the most disturbing concern may be this: Coastal restoration efforts have been under way for two decades, but not a single project capable of reversing the trend currently awaits approval.

The modest restoration efforts already under way have no chance of making a serious impact, experts say.

"It's like putting makeup on a corpse," said Mark Schexnayder, a regional coastal adviser with LSU's Sea Grant College Program who has spent 20 years involved in coastal restoration.

Decades after scientists alerted the nation to the problem, the Gulf not only continues to eat into the coast, its appetite remains insatiable: For every square mile the state has created since 1989, when serious restoration efforts started, the Gulf has devoured 5 more miles. Looking at just the wetlands surrounding New Orleans, the prognosis grows even more ominous, because these are the areas with the highest rates of loss on the coast.

Congress provided a note of hope last year, voting the state a permanent 37.5 percent slice of offshore oil revenues for coastal restoration work. But full financing -- some $650 million annually -- won't kick in until 2017. During the critical next decade, the state will be receiving only about $20 million a year, a pittance in the face of a problem that will require tens of billions of dollars to solve. Although the state could borrow against future revenues, scores of logistical and political hurdles remain.

St. Pe and others say 10 years will be too late for many coastal communities; they'll have to be moved within the next decade if serious land-building hasn't already started.

"If we aren't building land I can walk on inside of 10 years, we'll be moving communities," St. Pe said. "It's already the witching hour for a lot of these places, and a lot of other places are next."

TAKE NOTE. Inside of 20 years -- if social and political dysfunction doesn't do the deed sooner -- the defining story of our time will be the evacuation of New Orleans . . . forever . . . and the collapse of much of this nation's petrochemical infrastructure.

And because we did not care that a Third World state existed amid First World opulence, because we did not care that that Third World state sank from our consciousness into the deep blue sea, we will inevitably become a poorer, dessicated shell of the nation we once were.

Enjoy your wealth while you still can indulge your greed, America.

Boycotting the RIAA

Gizmodo has the scoop, and the "why," on fighting the recordo-thugs:

In case you missed it, last Friday we declared the month of March Boycott the RIAA Month. We've gotten sick and tired of always seeing the RIAA pulling deplorable moves and decided it was time for us to do something about it. We're kicking the month off with this, our manifesto. We want to be absolutely clear about what this fight is about and why it's so important. This is an overview of what the RIAA does, why it's damaging, and what we need to do to stop it. Consider this our planted flag.

First off, we want to be clear that this battle won't be over on March 31st. We declared March the Boycott the RIAA month to draw a line in the sand and to make a strong statement, but this is merely the beginning. Everything we're going to lay out here will still be true in April, in May, in June, and in the months that follow. March will be not the entirety of our efforts, but rather a kick off of our organized campaign to make a difference. We'll be posting tips for how to get the word out, ways to support artists without supporting the RIAA, and keeping you updated with everything that's going on throughout the entire month. With your help, we can educate people about how important this issue is and really make a difference.

The RIAA is the industry group that represents the four major record labels — Warner Music, EMI, Vivendi Universal, and Sony BMG — and all of their subsidiaries. They work on behalf of their members, and they have been accused of a wide range of offenses, from price-fixing to stifling innovation. They're able to perpetuate these crimes due to their huge bankroll, but that happens to be the one aspect of their organization we have control over. As consumers, we are the ones who stuff their coffers. By buying albums released by RIAA labels, we're giving them the money they use to sue our peers, stifle innovation, and force DRM down our throats. By cutting off their income stream, we can help make the RIAA less effective and therefore less damaging.

We're huge music fans here at Gizmodo, and that's why it's really hard to advocate not purchasing albums from artists we love. However, what everyone needs to understand is that we are in no means advocating piracy or not supporting musicians. The fact of the matter is, the RIAA's practices do not, in the end, support musicians or put money into their pockets. A fraction of the money from album sales actually makes it to artists, and not a single penny that the RIAA has received from their series of lawsuits has actually made it back to the artists that had their "copyrights infringed" in the first place.

The goal of the RIAA's lawsuits is to make people so afraid of being sued that they will stop downloading music. However, in their lawsuits they circumvent the law and extort money from people who haven't been given the benefit of a legal trial.

The process that the RIAA has in place to find and sue plaintiffs is designed not to provide a fair trial and prove guilt, but rather to confuse and intimidate people into settling out of court. What exactly happens is too detailed and lengthy for me to go into here, but Grant Robertson's Layperson's Guide to Filesharing Lawsuits is a must-read for anyone interested in what exactly happened in the 20,000+ lawsuits (so far) the RIAA has brought upon the citizens of this country.

Recently, the RIAA began looking to streamline the entire lawsuit process by cutting courts, lawyers, and any semblance of due process out altogether. Their new plan is to have ISPs point people to p2plawsuits.com (catchy!) and offer to discount their settlement by $1,000 if they pay up without going to court at all. By avoiding the court system, the RIAA can avoid paying those pesky lawyer's fees. Even better for them, they plan to require ISPs to retain all of their customer records for at least 180 days in order to be eligible for the $1,000 discount. This would make everyone's surfing and downloading history available to a non-governmental organization in order to make it easier for them to gather evidence for their intimidation lawsuits.

Beyond the harassment, extortion, and privacy invasion that the RIAA commits under the guise of lawsuits, they also stifle innovation by treating any open Internet source as a potential way for people to violate their copyrights. Recently, they filed a "motion for reconsideration" in a suit claiming that anything downloaded via an Internet connection is the responsibility of the owner of said connection. While the RIAA is trying to make it easier for them to get money out of the parents of kids they sue, the precedent that it would set would make it difficult, if not impossible, for open WiFi hotspots to exist. That means that the RIAA would make it impossible for you to connect to the web for free while out in a city that provides Internet access merely because you might use it to download music.

READ THE WHOLE THING on the Gizmodo website here.

Corporate kleptocracy takes aim at Web radio

The aim of Revolution 21 is to morph into a 24-hour Internet radio station, with an ultra low-power AM service on the side.

Well, was.

See, it's like this. The U.S. Copyright Royalty Board is hell-bent on killing Internet radio . . . at least Internet radio committed by programmers who can't afford to pay anywhere from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars in rights fees per year.

Non-profit, non-commercial webcasters still would pay just $500 a year under the new ruling -- so long as they don't get popular. But if non-comms average more than 146,000 aggregate tuning hours per month -- that is, average number of simultaneous listeners x number of streaming hours x 30 days -- they have to pay the commercial rate on everything over the cap.

That works out to an average of 202 simultaneous listeners if you stream your station 24 hours a day. Go over that, and it gets real expensive real fast.

And that's enough to give me -- Revolution 21 -- pause.

Veteran broadcaster Bill Goldsmith --who runs the popular Radio Paradise with his wife, Rebecca -- explains it all here:

I have been in love with radio all of my life, and spent 30-odd years dealing with the conflict between my vision of radio as an art form and my FM-station employers’ vision of radio as a conduit for advertising. I have watched the medium that I love turn from an essential part of the process of connecting those who love making music with those whose lives are touched by it into a mindless background hum of advertising and disposable musical sludge.

With the advent of the Internet, we were finally able to bring to life the radio station I had always wanted to work for (and listen to): commercial-free, passionate, and embracing a wide universe of musical treasures, from the classic rock artists I grew up with to the latest indie discoveries, with a liberal sprinkling of world music, electronica, jazz, even classical. We have slowly built up a loyal audience and have been able to support ourselves while living our dream.

The Internet has changed radio in a profound way. Instead of a business that required investments so huge (millions of dollars for even a small-market FM station) that a programming focus on the lowest common denominator and an extreme aversion to risk or experimentation was an unavoidable consequence, a radio station with a global reach was now within the grasp of anyone with the talent and determination to make it happen.

Every day we hear from listeners who are profoundly touched by our efforts - by the music we play, by the way we assemble the songs into meaningful sequences that are more than the sum of their parts, by our passion for what we are doing, and our commitment to never contaminating the music with advertising. And our station is but one of many who have attracted that kind of passionate following, and provided that kind of outlet for radio artists like myself.

The Internet’s paradigm-shifting gift to radio programmers and music lovers - at least those in the US - is now in danger of being taken away by the misguided actions of the US Copyright Board. The performance royalty rates released by the Copyright Board on March 1, 2007 are not just extreme, not just burdensome. They are a death sentence for all US-based independent webcasters like Radio Paradise, SOMA-FM, Digitally Imported, and many others.

The facts and figures of the new rates are detailed in Kurt Hanson’s newsletter for 3/2/07. Kurt’s analysis of the financial impact of the new rates is entirely accurate, and chilling.

There has been much discussion about how unfair these rates are, but our listeners find one fact particularly appalling: while Internet stations like ours are being told they must pay royalty fees that exceed their income, sometimes by several times over, FM stations - including those owned by media conglomerates like Clear Channel - pay nothing at all!

Yes, both FM stations and Internet stations pay royalties to songwriters and/or music publishers. But the royalties in question are owed to the owners of performance copyrights, which means, in most cases, record companies - and to them, FM stations pay nothing at all.

How is it possible for such a massive disparity to exist? For the answer to that we need to go back to the 1990s, when music industry lobbyists persuaded Congress to include wording in two pieces of legislation (the Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998) that drew a sharp division between analog and digital broadcasts. Their reasoning was that a digital radio transmission was not a radio broadcast at all, but a sequence of perfect digital copies of music performances provided to the user, who could then copy them rather than paying to own a CD.

This is a profoundly flawed piece of reasoning, but members of Congress (who at that time had no idea how this whole digital thing worked) accepted it at face value, and agreed that it was only fair that digital broadcasts be subject to additional copyright fees, to be determined by an impartial (in theory…) ruling by the Copyright Office.

Let’s reassess that reasoning in the light of 21st-century reality. Is there, in truth, a fundamental difference in the experience of an online listener to Radio Paradise and someone who was listening to identical programming on an FM station? Every one of our listeners - indeed, anyone who has ever clicked on a webcast as background music while working - knows the answer to that question. No! There is no difference whatsoever. Radio is radio, whether it comes in digital or analog form.

As for the recording angle, I would challenge any random group of RIAA lawyers, copyright judges, or members of Congress to listen to a digital recording of our radio station and a high-quality cassette recording of an analog FM station and tell which was which. I guarantee that they could not. The differences in quality are too subtle for all but the most discerning listener to notice.

The quality jump between AM and FM broadcasts was an order of magnitude more significant, yet the music industry managed to thrive their way through that transition. The advent of decent-quality cassette recorders in the 70s, coupled with stereo FM broadcasting, made it possible for anyone who wanted to to make copies of their favorite songs from the radio, with a quality not too different from the analog LPs sold at the time. Did that spell a death-knell for the music industry? Not hardly. The 70s and 80s saw a phenomenal growth in the sales of LPs and, later, CDs.

Ah, but the music industry thought that home music recording would destroy their sales, and lobbied unsuccessfully in the 1970s to cripple that technology. The same fear-based and misguided reasoning popped up again in the 90s, with the advent of digital recording and broadcasting, and this time the industry - flush with dollars earned after their earlier fears were proved groundless - succeeded in this attempt to preserve their bottom line at the expense of, well, pretty much every one else.

Crippling an exciting, groundbreaking industry like Internet radio is certainly not in the best interests of the public, nor that of musical artists, and not even - if history is any judge - of the music industry itself. Just as they were unable to see how the advent of home music taping actually spurred the sale of LPs and CDs, they are unable to tell exactly what impact Internet radio and other forms of digital media will have on the future of their industry - and to behave as if they do know, and for Congress to go along with them, is a grave error, and public disservice, that needs to be recognized and corrected.

So, if we are building a business - even a non-commercial business like Radio Paradise - by the use of copyrighted material, isn’t it fair that we pay for its use? Perhaps it is. But the fact remains that what we are doing does not differ in any substantive way from what a company like Clear Channel is doing, and to move forward under the fiction that such a distinction exists is neither fair nor rational.

Perhaps the most equitable solution is for all broadcasters - analog or digital, terrestrial, satellite, or Internet - to pay such royalties equally, just as they all pay more or less equally for the use of music compositions. This is the situation in many other places in the world, including most of Europe. The fact that the US broadcasting lobby has successfully out-spent and out-maneuvered the music industry on this issue should not be “balanced” by Internet radio royalty rates so high that they cripple that entire industry.

That kind of reform will take some time - time that people like my wife and myself just don’t have. We are hoping that we can, along with a small group of other independent webcasters, negotiate a separate settlement with the RIAA, similar to the one we negotiated in 2002. That agreement allowed us to operate by paying a royalty equal to 10% - 12% of our gross income in performance royalties. That has been enough of a burden for a struggling “mom & pop” operation like ours, but it has allowed us to survive since that point. However, that agreement has expired, and we are now liable for royalties, retroactive to the beginning of 2006, that are equal to approximately 125% of our income.

Trust me, it has been difficult to write those checks knowing that the foundation that the entire royalty structure is based on is a lie. Perhaps we will succeed in negotiating a new deal with them. If we do, it will probably be at a significantly higher rate - creating even more of a burden on small businesses like ours.

My question is this: why should we continue to be penalized for the mistakes made by Congress back in the 1990s?

MEANWHILE, a commenter Sunday to a Wired magazine blog post laid out what such a blatantly onerous ruling means for him and his webcasting business:

With my current properties and listeners I would end up paying $100,000.00 a month to stream. That's just to Sound Exchange!! This is the MOST outrageous ruling I have ever seen in my life. 60 Million Internet Radio listeners ever day are streamed, I don't think they are going to be too happy when their favorite stations go away. The whole thing is depressing and I personally have around 20,000 listeners currently. So for me, this will be the end if something isn't done to fix this. I know of 50 different broadcasters that are going to file Bankruptcy as soon as they can over this. It's a damn shame, we work SO hard 24 hours a day sometimes to break even with the current rates, and now they want a whole year of retroactive money! That for me will be the end, if I have to do that. I'm not looking for sympathy, just want people to know that its really hitting everyone hard. The trickle down effect will be tremendous. I can see Cogent Corp. going down, Small Hosting companies, digital music sales will be generated from out of the country, Amazon.com will loose tons of revenue. The measuring and stats companies will die. Andomedia, Webcastmetrics, and thousands of other companies based in the USA will go under. I hope we can do something about this. I'm beside myself, don't know what to do. Have a family and will have to work somewhere else and start over at a late age. It's horrible. Hope everyone can write their congress reps or let the CBR know what they have done.

LAWS WHICH ALLOW the big and powerful to target and victimize the small and relatively powerless are inherently immoral and unjust. This applies to human relations, and this likewise applies to free expression and commercial activity.

To quote the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in his Letter From Birmingham Jail:

One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all.” . . .

We presently face a situation where an American government professing to be "of the people, by the people and for the people" is anything but. Successive Republican -- and Democrat -- administrations and Congresses consistently have placed the interest of transnational corporations above the well-being of average Americans, not to mention vulnerable and poor Americans.

This pattern naturally has extended now to regulation of Internet broadcasting. Under the present unjust regulations and onerous fee structure, Clear Channel (or NPR, for that matter) will have the clout and the resources to cut a deal.

You won't. And I sure as hell don't.

So where does that leave us?

MY SUGGESTION for an initial way to fight back is to starve the bastards. In this case, the "bastards" would be the Recording Industry Association of America. This is the organization representing all the big labels, and this is the organization that was pushing the Feds to bleed the last drop of cash flow from the Internet radio industry.

It's also the organization suing college kids into oblivion for illicit music downloading.

The way to "starve the bastards" is to cut off THEIR cash flow. Don't buy their stuff.

Of course, that also would "starve" the good (independent music retailers, for example) along with the bullies. So, to mitigate the damage to places like Homer's in Omaha, I would suggest not buying any new music (unless it's on small, local labels) but buying the hell out of used CDs and used vinyl, which a great many independent music stores also deal in.

That way, money flows to the retailer but not a penny to the avaricious executives hiding in the shadow of their corporate lobby, the RIAA.

FIGHT. Fight now.

Big Brother is closer than you think.

Psalm 150

1 Praise ye the LORD. Praise God in his sanctuary: praise him in the firmament of his power.
2 Praise him for his mighty acts: praise him according to his excellent greatness.
3 Praise him with the sound of the trumpet: praise him with the psaltery and harp.
4 Praise him with the timbrel and dance: praise him with stringed instruments and organs.
5 Praise him upon the loud cymbals: praise him upon the high sounding cymbals.
6 Let every thing that hath breath praise the LORD. Praise ye the LORD.

Psalm 2

1 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.
5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.
6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.
7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.
10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.
11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

Ann Coulter: Fascist or jackass? You decide.

Now that conservatives are pretty much done raising hell (rightly) about John Edwards' former staff fascists, Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan, they are confronted with an old dilemma of their own: What, oh what, to do with Ann Coulter?

After the right's resident bomb-thrower called the Democratic presidential candidate a "faggot" Friday, her audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference made their choice. They cheered and applauded her.

Which makes them -- not to mention Coulter (whom I consider both a fascist AND a jackass) -- not one bit better than Edwards' erstwhile Internet mavens, who were noted for using the same level of language about Christians that Coulter routinely spews . . . to the delight of the GOP's lynch mobs.

Coulter claims to be a Christian. I say she's more like a Pharisee with jackbooted overtones.

She throws around slurs like "faggot" like so much self-righteous confetti. But here's how the Lord she claims to follow dealt with her ilk long, long ago:

2
But early in the morning he arrived again in the temple area, and all the people started coming to him, and he sat down and taught them.
3
Then the scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery and made her stand in the middle.
4
They said to him, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the very act of committing adultery.
5
Now in the law, Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you say?"
6
They said this to test him, so that they could have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and began to write on the ground with his finger.
7
But when they continued asking him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let the one among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her."
8
Again he bent down and wrote on the ground.
9
And in response, they went away one by one, beginning with the elders. So he was left alone with the woman before him.
10
Then Jesus straightened up and said to her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"
11
She replied, "No one, sir." Then Jesus said, "Neither do I condemn you. Go, (and) from now on do not sin any more."

YOU'LL NOTE that it wasn't the adulterous woman who raised hell until the Romans crucified Jesus. It was the people who used their religious faith for political ends, which is tantamount to making your political ends your true religious faith.

And that's anti-Christ, if not Antichrist.

Psalm 15

A Psalm of David.

1 LORD, who shall abide in thy tabernacle? who shall dwell in thy holy hill?
2 He that walketh uprightly, and worketh righteousness, and speaketh the truth in his heart.
3 He that backbiteth not with his tongue, nor doeth evil to his neighbour, nor taketh up a reproach against his neighbour.
4 In whose eyes a vile person is contemned; but he honoureth them that fear the LORD. He that sweareth to his own hurt, and changeth not.
5 He that putteth not out his money to usury, nor taketh reward against the innocent. He that doeth these things shall never be moved.

How do you say the Big Show is scary to the fascist oppressors in Mandarin?

Hey! Great news, y'all!

The parent site of the Revolution 21 podcast -- www.revolution21.org -- has been blocked by the Chinese government.

I found this out when, on a whim, I checked our URL on The Great Firewall of China, which tells you what sites are allowed -- or blocked -- in the People's Republic. For the life of me, I don't know why this is . . . Revolution 21 being blocked, that is.
What could be threatening to the Chinese government in our little old website? The subversive rock 'n' roll music? Jesus Christ? The Roman Catholic Church? Commitment to the dignity of all human life, from the womb until natural death?

Disdain of repressive regimes of every stripe?

I DON'T GET IT. But there we are -- banned. Blocked. Apparently unavailable in the workers' paradise of low wages, with the exception of the no-wage policy in the laogai.

But in typically inefficient bureaucratic bungling, there's a catch. If you avoid the Revolution 21.org domain, you can get to the blog and podcast in mainland China. Just go right here directly -- to www.revolution-21.blogspot.com.

Tee hee hee.

I'm too subversive for the web. Imagine that.

Double-U Bee Are AITCH!

WBRH

90.3 on your FM dial

I HAD FORGOTTEN that I'd even taken these 1981 photos until I recently went through old large-format negatives stashed away in a three-ring binder from a long-ago college photojournalism class.

I passed, by the way.

Apparently, I must have been killing time after my classes at Louisiana State University were done for the day that summer session in '81. And, obviously, I had my university-issue Yashica twin-lens reflex camera with me.

Not the greatest camera in the world for fast-paced, run-and-shoot photojournalism, but a FANTASTIC camera if you have a little time and crave detailed images. (Those 2-inch by 2-inch negatives allow fine detail and can be enlarged like nobody's business before the print starts to look grainy.)

SOOOOOOOO . . . that summer afternoon, I swung by Baton Rouge Magnet High School to say howdy to the folks at WBRH-FM, where I'd pulled my last student air shift a little more than two years earlier. When I was at 'BRH, the station operated with a "booming" 20 watts of effective radiated power at 90.1 MHz.

Sometime around when I took these pictures -- but don't quote me on that after 25-plus years -- the station was moving just up the dial to 90.3 FM and increasing its power to 200 watts. (Now the station runs with 20,000 watts and has a sister AM station, 1260 KBRH.)

And everything -- as you'll note from the photos -- was glorious analog. Tape, carts and vinyl. Period. CD players wouldn't hit the market (or the first radio studio) for another two years.

Now, WBRH has a format of "smooth" jazz during the day and classic jazz at night, with specialty programs on the weekends. Back in 1981, student DJs like James Edwards, shown here, would play classical and jazz during the morning and early afternoon, then rock out in late afternoon and at night.

WBRH is going to mark its 30th anniversary this September. Which will be the 29th anniversary of beginning my tenure there. (Sigh . . . didn't work up the nerve to take radio broadcasting until my junior year.)

MAYBE, JUST MAYBE they'll let me come back for one more DJ shift, so I can play Chicago Transit Authority's "Free Form Guitar" on the WBRH air just one more time. Or not.

Can anyone see from the last photo whether they'd finally taken down my joke promo copy for Painful Rectal Itch, the fictitious weekly progressive-rock program, sponsored by the makers of Preparation H? It used to be on the control-room window, above the mixing console.

Psalm 110

A Psalm of David.

1 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
2 The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.
3 Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth.
4 The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.
5 The Lord at thy right hand shall strike through kings in the day of his wrath.
6 He shall judge among the heathen, he shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many countries.
7 He shall drink of the brook in the way: therefore shall he lift up the head.

Psalm 43

1 Judge me, O God, and plead my cause against an ungodly nation: O deliver me from the deceitful and unjust man.
2 For thou art the God of my strength: why dost thou cast me off? why go I mourning because of the oppression of the enemy?
3 O send out thy light and thy truth: let them lead me; let them bring me unto thy holy hill, and to thy tabernacles.
4 Then will I go unto the altar of God, unto God my exceeding joy: yea, upon the harp will I praise thee, O God my God.
5 Why art thou cast down, O my soul? and why art thou disquieted within me? hope in God: for I shall yet praise him, who is the health of my countenance, and my God.